Effect of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for pre-exposure prophylaxis during the China Omicron outbreak.

OBJECTIVES: By the end of 2022, China had made a pivotal decision to optimize the COVID-19 policy. The dominant Omicron variant in China at that time was highly transmissible. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of tixagevimab and cilgavimab against this background in China. METHODS: Participants were enrolled if they were over 12 years old and were planning to receive tixagevimab or cilgavimab. All participants received intramuscular administration of tixagevimab (150 mg) and cilgavimab (150 mg). Data were collected on demographics, underlying illness, prior infection, vaccination, adverse events, and COVID-19 outcomes (e.g., infection rate, hospitalization rate, and severe disease). RESULTS: During the study period, 168 (37.9%) of 443 who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. All infected patients had mild COVID-19. Two patients (0.5%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, but none of them were admitted to the ICU. None of the patients died during this study. 4 (0.9%) reported mild local adverse events, and no severe systemic adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab may have protected high-risk populations against infection with the Omicron variant, hospitalization and severe disease during the China COVID-19 pandemic.

Association between multiple gene promoter hypermethylation and the risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated an association between multiple gene hypermethylation and gastric cancer. However, the intrinsic mechanisms remain elusive and highly debatable. To this end, our study aims to investigate the correlation between the methylation status of multiple gene promoters and gastric cancer. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, WanFang, Cqvip, and Cochrane Library were queried from inception to May 2021, and the relationship between the methylation status of the CpG islands and gastric cancer risk was systematically assessed under the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The incidence of DNA methylation between tumor and non-tumor tissues was compared, and the clinicopathological significance of DNA methylation in gastric carcinoma was further evaluated. The odds ratio (OR) was estimated with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and forest plots were generated using the fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: In total, 201 studies were enrolled, and a higher frequency of CpG islands methylation was identified in gastric cancer tissues than in non-neoplastic tissues. This suggests that aberrant polygene methylation might be associated with the initial onset and progression of gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the significance of polygene methylation status in gastric cancer. The DNA methylation of these genes may serve as underlying epigenetic biomarkers, providing a promising molecular diagnostic approach for human gastric cancer clinical diagnosis. More large randomized trials are needed to confirm the findings.